On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 09:05:03PM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 02:43:17AM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > > > > I don't mind having it in-tree if I can ignore it (assuming the project > > > attitude is the "it's a side thing" from above). It's the CI failures > > > that make it hard to ignore. > > > > ...but on this thread-at-large, I'd much rather see us focus on just > > reviewing the patches I have here than raising the burden of proof to > > whether we should get rid of it entirely. > > Fair. In case it is not obvious, I have no interest in reviewing cmake > patches. ;) But I will at least stop making noise in the thread. Same, and same. Sorry for semi-derailing this thread. I don't feel strongly enough about the CMake stuff to start a new thread about it on the list, but while others are discussing it, I figured that I might as well chime in. Thanks Taylor