Re: [PATCH] maintenance: use xcalloc instead of xmalloc where possible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 12/5/22 9:48 AM, Rose via GitGitGadget wrote:
From: Seija <doremylover123@xxxxxxxxx>

We can avoid having to call memset by calling xcalloc directly

Signed-off-by: Seija doremylover123@xxxxxxxxx
---
     maintenance: use xcalloc instead of xmalloc where possible
We can avoid having to call memset by calling xcalloc directly Signed-off-by: Seija doremylover123@xxxxxxxxx

Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-1390%2FAtariDreams%2Fcalloc-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-1390/AtariDreams/calloc-v1
Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/1390

  remote.c    | 4 +---
  submodule.c | 3 +--
  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
index 60869beebe7..75315f3563f 100644
--- a/remote.c
+++ b/remote.c
@@ -2741,9 +2741,7 @@ void apply_push_cas(struct push_cas_option *cas,
struct remote_state *remote_state_new(void)
  {
-	struct remote_state *r = xmalloc(sizeof(*r));
-
-	memset(r, 0, sizeof(*r));
+	struct remote_state *r = xcalloc(1, sizeof(*r));

We have a macro to make this easier and hide the messy details:

	struct remote_state *r;

	CALLOC_ARRAY(r, 1);


Jeff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux