René Scharfe <l.s.r@xxxxxx> writes: > Depends on the meaning of "fixed". If it stops removing CRs then this > line is unaffected -- .crlf-orig-$branch.txt contains no CRs. OK, that "fix" was what I was worried about and if there is no problem with the input we use, that is good ;-) > If it > starts adding CRs then we'd have a problem with all grep invocations, > which was addressed by 4d715ac05c (Windows: a test_cmp that is agnostic > to random LF <> CRLF conversions, 2013-10-26). Yeah, but I thought that the unspoken motivation behind recent changes are so that we do not have to rely on "the differences between CRLF and LF do not matter" version of test_cmp? Thanks.
