Re: [PATCH 0/4] Don't lazy-fetch commits when parsing them

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 12:30:45PM -0800, Jonathan Tan wrote:

> This is a follow-up from my previous email about the possibility of not
> fetching when we know that we're fetching a commit [1]. I had to refactor a few
> things mostly due to replace objects, so the number of patches might be larger
> than you would expect. I tried to keep each patch small and easy to understand,
> though.
> 
> Patches 1-3 contain some forward-compatibility and refactoring changes, and
> patch 4 contains the actual logic change.

These look pretty good to me. I raised a minor nit in patch 2; if you
agree it should be a trivial re-roll.

I left some thoughts on the approach in patch 4, but I think given that
this is a strict improvement over the status quo, it's a good step
forward, even if it won't catch all such cases.

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux