Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > I agree it's not hurting here, it's OK for me to make the improvement > > here. But I have a question, do we prefer to omit the initialization > > in such scenarios if we make sure it will initialized correctly？ > > I don't know that we have a particular rule here, but I would say that > yes, if you know the initialization isn't used, then skip it. That > communicates the expectation to anybody reading the code. And if you're > wrong, the compiler will generally notice. Thanks for the explanation!
