"Sean Allred via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> From: Sean Allred <allred.sean@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> With our target git_var value now available, we no longer need to call
> into read_var() to find its read() function again. This does avoid a
> second loop through git_vars, but mostly it just removes a lot of
> duplicated logic.
If I were doing this series, I would probably have written a single
patch for the steps 1 & 2 from the beginning. That way, reviewers
can clearly see what the differences in behaviour between
get_git_var() and read_var() in that patch to see that the single
step is a strict improvement.
Other than that, both patches 1 & 2 look good.
Thanks.
> Signed-off-by: Sean Allred <allred.sean@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> builtin/var.c | 16 +---------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/var.c b/builtin/var.c
> index 776f1778ae1..e215cd3b0c0 100644
> --- a/builtin/var.c
> +++ b/builtin/var.c
> @@ -67,20 +67,6 @@ static const struct git_var *get_git_var(const char *var)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -static const char *read_var(const char *var)
> -{
> - struct git_var *ptr;
> - const char *val;
> - val = NULL;
> - for (ptr = git_vars; ptr->read; ptr++) {
> - if (strcmp(var, ptr->name) == 0) {
> - val = ptr->read(IDENT_STRICT);
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> - return val;
> -}
> -
> static int show_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *cb)
> {
> if (value)
> @@ -108,7 +94,7 @@ int cmd_var(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> if (!git_var)
> usage(var_usage);
>
> - val = read_var(argv[1]);
> + val = git_var->read(IDENT_STRICT);
> if (!val)
> return 1;
