On November 24, 2022 4:51 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: >On Thu, Nov 24 2022, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > >> [CC-ing Jeff, this is from the "stopwatch timers" topic] >> >> On Thu, Nov 24 2022, rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >>> While running t2201.7 (and subsequent) for 2.39.0-rc0, I hit a >>> condition >>> where: >> >> Don't you mean t0211-trace2-perf.sh? >> >>> <snip> >>> + test_when_finished rm trace.perf actual test_config_global >>> + trace2.perfBrief 1 pwd test_config_global trace2.perfTarget >>> /home/ituglib/randall/jenkins/.jenkins/workspace/Git_Pipeline/t/trash >>> directory.t0211-trace2-perf/trace.perf >>> + test-tool trace2 101timer 5 10 3 >>> fatal: failed to create thread[0] >>> >>> was encountered, causing the test to fail. Pointers on resolving this >>> would be helpful. >> >> Apparently we really could use a NO_PTHREADS=Y CI setup, because >> that's all that's needed to reproduce this on linux & elsewhere. >> Running the test with that: >> >> + test-tool trace2 101timer 5 10 3 >> fatal: failed to create thread[0] >> error: last command exited with $?=128 >> >> For that all that's needed is this: >> >> diff --git a/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh b/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh >> index 0b3436e8cac..cfba6861322 100755 >> --- a/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh >> +++ b/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh >> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ test_expect_success 'stopwatch timer test/test1' ' >> have_timer_event "main" "timer" "test" "test1" 5 actual >> ' >> >> -test_expect_success 'stopwatch timer test/test2' ' >> +test_expect_success PTHREADS 'stopwatch timer test/test2' ' >> test_when_finished "rm trace.perf actual" && >> test_config_global trace2.perfBrief 1 && >> test_config_global trace2.perfTarget "$(pwd)/trace.perf" && >> @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ test_expect_success 'global counter test/test1' ' >> have_counter_event "main" "counter" "test" "test1" 15 actual >> ' >> >> -test_expect_success 'global counter test/test2' ' >> +test_expect_success PTHREADS 'global counter test/test2' ' >> test_when_finished "rm trace.perf actual" && >> test_config_global trace2.perfBrief 1 && >> test_config_global trace2.perfTarget "$(pwd)/trace.perf" && >> >> I think that's the correct fix here, and it should go into rc1. > >I submitted a fix at >https://lore.kernel.org/git/patch-1.1-f7f21c94a6c-20221124T214813Z- >avarab@xxxxxxxxx/; >but I see that since your message-id's contain "$" I got the In-Reply-To wrong, >sorry :) Thanks
