RE: [BUG} t2201.7+ Failure to Create Thread in 2.39.0-rc0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On November 24, 2022 1:41 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>[CC-ing Jeff, this is from the "stopwatch timers" topic]
>
>On Thu, Nov 24 2022, rsbecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> While running t2201.7 (and subsequent) for 2.39.0-rc0, I hit a
>> condition
>> where:
>
>Don't you mean t0211-trace2-perf.sh?
>
>> <snip>
>> + test_when_finished rm trace.perf actual test_config_global
>> + trace2.perfBrief 1 pwd test_config_global trace2.perfTarget
>> /home/ituglib/randall/jenkins/.jenkins/workspace/Git_Pipeline/t/trash
>> directory.t0211-trace2-perf/trace.perf
>> + test-tool trace2 101timer 5 10 3
>> fatal: failed to create thread[0]
>>
>> was encountered, causing the test to fail. Pointers on resolving this
>> would be helpful.
>
>Apparently we really could use a NO_PTHREADS=Y CI setup, because that's all
>that's needed to reproduce this on linux & elsewhere. Running the test with that:
>
>	+ test-tool trace2 101timer 5 10 3
>	fatal: failed to create thread[0]
>	error: last command exited with $?=128
>
>For that all that's needed is this:
>
>	diff --git a/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh b/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh
>	index 0b3436e8cac..cfba6861322 100755
>	--- a/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh
>	+++ b/t/t0211-trace2-perf.sh
>	@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ test_expect_success 'stopwatch timer test/test1' '
>	 	have_timer_event "main" "timer" "test" "test1" 5 actual
>	 '
>
>	-test_expect_success 'stopwatch timer test/test2' '
>	+test_expect_success PTHREADS 'stopwatch timer test/test2' '
>	 	test_when_finished "rm trace.perf actual" &&
>	 	test_config_global trace2.perfBrief 1 &&
>	 	test_config_global trace2.perfTarget "$(pwd)/trace.perf" &&
>	@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ test_expect_success 'global counter test/test1' '
>	 	have_counter_event "main" "counter" "test" "test1" 15 actual
>	 '
>
>	-test_expect_success 'global counter test/test2' '
>	+test_expect_success PTHREADS 'global counter test/test2' '
>	 	test_when_finished "rm trace.perf actual" &&
>	 	test_config_global trace2.perfBrief 1 &&
>	 	test_config_global trace2.perfTarget "$(pwd)/trace.perf" &&
>
>I think that's the correct fix here, and it should go into rc1.

I assume we do not have to modify the platform's entry in config.mak.uname, which already has NO_PTHREADS=UnfortunatelyYes.

Thanks,
Randall




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux