Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > ... My > concern is to avoid doing something in a patch set that we will later need to > undo; I think that we are indeed avoiding it here (we're doing A but we will > still need it in the future, so there is no undoing of A needed). > > So overall, after this discussion, this patch set looks good to me, except for > the minor points that I have commented on in my previous emails. Thanks for a summary.
