Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Makes sense. Well explained. > > A separate problem is that chainlint.pl doesn't fall back to a > sensible non-zero value if ncores() returns 0 (or some other nonsense > value). That is, of course, outside the scope of the well-focused > problem fix which this standalone patch addresses. I may end up > submitting a fix separately to make it fall back sensibly. > ... > As mentioned elsewhere[1], this code may eventually be dropped > altogether, but this fix is good to have in the meantime. Thanks. Thanks, both. Will apply.
