Re: [PATCH v6] status: long status advice adapted to recent capabilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 12:18 PM Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 11:52 AM Rudy Rigot <rudy.rigot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > you might write the commit message like this
> > - the end of what I get when running 'sh ./t7508-status.sh -v':
> > https://gist.github.com/rudyrigot/ee80f3d59231f25698c9dd6c48d8ab85. It
> > seems like 2 of my 3 tests are failing, but the output isn't very
> > helpful to figure out why.
>
> The second 'gist' URL seems broken, so I can't comment on the exact
> output. Without having seen the actual problem, I can't really provide
> direct feedback for fixing the precise issue, however...

Despite the URL of the second git being broken, I notice that you have
some "-v" output tacked onto the first gist. Indeed, the "-v" output
isn't very helpful here. What I normally do when debugging failing
tests is run with "-x" and "-i". The "-x" shows all the output the
test produces, including any error messages. So "./t7508-status.sh -x
-i" would likely make it easier to diagnose such failures. (But first
try the suggestion I made in my previous reply for isolating the new
tests in their own repository.)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux