Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 08:24:21AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > * ab/various-leak-fixes (2022-11-08) 18 commits >> > (merged to 'next' on 2022-11-18 at 8828bb7161) >> > ... >> > (this branch is used by ab/merge-index-prep.) >> >> > * pw/rebase-no-reflog-action (2022-11-09) 2 commits >> > (merged to 'next' on 2022-11-14 at 790dadc8d3) >> > ... >> > (this branch is used by ab/merge-index-prep.) >> >> The other topic referred to is not described anywhere, and not part >> of 'seen'. Intended? > > It was merged intentionally via 790dadc8d3 (Merge branch > 'pw/rebase-no-reflog-action' into next, 2022-11-14) as you note, though > I'm not sure why the description from 790dadc8d3 didn't make it into the > WC report. > > In any case, the description I went with is: > > Avoid setting GIT_REFLOG_ACTION to improve readability of the > sequencer internals. Sorry, but the question was about ab/merge-index-prep that does not exist in the report and not in 'seen'. For now, I'll ignore that phantom user of these two topics. It can come back when dust settles ;-).