On 11/20/22 09:14, Stefan Sundin wrote: > You are right, Bagas. I assumed, without actually looking it up, that > the new function had a higher-than-acceptable minimum macOS version > requirement. It turns out that the new function was added in 10.6 > which is far better than requiring 10.13. > > Please disregard this patch and I will attempt to update the code to > use the new function instead. OK. But unfortunately, I don't have any macOS machines handy, so I can't test your future patch. Thanks. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
