On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 04:41:25PM -0800, Elijah Newren wrote: > (I haven't looked much at reftable, so I can't opine on that question, > but Stolee's approach did seem eminently easier to review. I did have > some questions about his proposal(s) because I didn't quite understand > them, in part due to being unfamiliar with the area.) For what it's worth, I'm in the same boat as you are. That being said, I do find it somewhat sad that we have reftable bits in Junio's tree that don't appear to be progressing all that much. So as much as I would like to see us have fewer reference backends, I'd rather see whatever the "next-gen" backend be have good support and momentum, even if that means carrying more code. Thanks, Taylor
