Glen Choo <chooglen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Rereading this series and thinking about this some more, let's go with > your approach, primarily because it avoids global state. > > From this series, it seems that it's not that hard to make this change > and support whatever use cases we currently have. > > This does make it more tedious to add more "--super-prefix" in the > future, but that's a good push for us to do more things in-process > and/or be more principled about passing context objects through the call > stack instead of relying on globals. > > Let me know what I can add to this effort besides reviewing :) Specifically, if you have other things on your plate, I'd be happy to pick up where where this RFC has left off.
