Re: Git User's Survey 2007 unfinished summary continued

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 14 Oct 2007, Steven Grimm wrote:

> Verbosity. IMO Mercurial swings too far in this direction, but in general it's
> either completely silent or very terse in its output. There is never, as far
> as I can see, any low-level diagnostic information spit out to the user unless
> an hg command is run with a "verbose" option. Here's "hg pull; hg update", for
> example (and "pull" is one of hg's chattier commands):
> 
> pulling from ../child1
> searching for changes
> adding changesets
> adding manifests
> adding file changes
> added 8 changesets with 8 changes to 3 files (+1 heads)
> (run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
> 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
> 
> Compare with the equivalent "git pull" and put yourself in the shoes of a user
> who is running that command for the first time:

BTW I have patches here reworking the progress code for a more compact 
display which should mitigate this issue quite a bit.


Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux