On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 01:57:12AM +0000, Victoria Dye via GitGitGadget wrote: > Changes since V1 > ================ > > * Rewrote 'p0090' to more accurately and reliably test 'prime_cache_tree()' > vs. 'cache_tree_update()'. > * Moved iterative cache tree update out of C and into the shell tests (to > avoid potential runtime optimizations) > * Added a "control" test to document how much of the execution time is > startup overhead > * Added tests demonstrating performance in partially-invalid cache trees. > * Fixed the use of 'prime_cache_tree()' in 'test-tool cache-tree', changing > it from using the tree at HEAD to the current cache tree. All seem very reasonable to me, and the range-diff matches what you say. Let's hear from Stolee, who reviewed the first round, too, and then we should feel comfortable to start merging this down. Thanks, Taylor
