Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] leak fixes: use existing constructors & other trivia

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 07:17:36PM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> This is a bag of simple leak fixes, mostly one-line additions where we
> use existing destructors. See [1] for v1.
>
> Changes since v1:
>
>  * Rebased on pw/rebase-no-reflog-action, per [2].
>  * It'll merge just fine without pw/rebase-no-reflog-action, but some
>    of the tests marked as leak-free will still leak then. So, in
>    practice they can be staged independently, as long as
>    pw/rebase-no-reflog-action is merged down first.
>  * The 10/15 here has an updated explanation about why we were leaking
>    that value. see also[3].

Looking good. I did a --no-ff merge of 'pw/rebase-no-reflog-action' into
this topic, and pushed out the result.

Let's start merging it down.

Thanks,
Taylor



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux