On Mon, Nov 07 2022, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07 2022, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
>> +TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true
>
> Thanks for adding this! :)
Hrm, I spoke too soon :) This series adds new leaks, so it'll fail with
the linux-leaks job. I have the following local monkeypatch on top,
which obviously doesn't address the root cause. The t6018 leak is new
due to the new tests you added.
diff --git a/t/t6018-rev-list-glob.sh b/t/t6018-rev-list-glob.sh
index f92616de12d..54221588dd0 100755
--- a/t/t6018-rev-list-glob.sh
+++ b/t/t6018-rev-list-glob.sh
@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ test_description='rev-list/rev-parse --glob'
GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main
export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME
-TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true
. ./test-lib.sh
commit () {
diff --git a/t/t6021-rev-list-exclude-hidden.sh b/t/t6021-rev-list-exclude-hidden.sh
index d08fc2da93d..908b9dba611 100755
--- a/t/t6021-rev-list-exclude-hidden.sh
+++ b/t/t6021-rev-list-exclude-hidden.sh
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
test_description='git rev-list --exclude-hidden test'
-TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true
. ./test-lib.sh
test_expect_success 'setup' '
