Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] t5551: be less strict about the number of credential warnings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 5:15 AM Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 04:49:37AM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> > > Note that the tests for the "die" mode don't need adjusted. They die
> >
> > s/adjusted/adjustment --or -- s/need/& to be/
>
> https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/5407/central-pennsylvanian-english-speakers-what-are-the-limitations-on-the-needs-w
>
> Don't stomp on my linguistic heritage. :)

Sorry. My head needs hanged in shame. I forgot that I can't grammar.
(I can't math either.)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux