Re: [PATCH 0/14] fork/exec removal series

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On dim, oct 14, 2007 at 07:17:51 +0000, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On dim, oct 14, 2007 at 07:12:39 +0000, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
  The trivial way is to add a __thread keyword to make them TLS
variables, though, it's not really a step in the direction of
portability, and last time I looked at it, mingw didn't had TLS support,
not sure if msys has. Though, if Msys has, it's worth using, and we
  Okay forget it, mingw and msys are one and the same *g*.
  So well, maybe threading isn't such a so great idea :/

  And again last time I checked it was still a mingw 3.x in debian, now
that it's 4.2.1 it seems to support __thread (but not
__declspec(thread)) and their changelog seems to confirm that fact [0].

  So the question holds again, do we require pthread-using targets to
support TLS ? It feels sane and right to me, but …


To me it's a sane place to start. As time goes by and people on non-TLS
capable systems come along that need the functionality (or the speedup;
fork() is expensive on some systems), they can probably implement it
themselves or at least give voice to the fact that they need it.

--
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@xxxxxx
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux