On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 07:47:33PM -0400, Taylor Blau wrote: > The documentation on how to use the scripts in 'todo' has a couple of > small typos that make it confusing when generating the Meta/redo-jch.sh > and Meta/redo-seen.sh scripts the first time. > > Correct these to avoid any confusion in the future. Thanks for writing these up. A little back-story: Taylor and I had looked at this together off-list, because the results of following the documentation to the letter made little sense. So both look good to me, with the giant grain of salt that I was party to the original head-scratching that led to the patches. Given that there's no urgency (unless you are hit by a bus in the next few weeks), it probably makes sense to queue these fixes and wait for Junio to review and (hopefully) merge them. There is one thing we wondered about, and I think only Junio can answer. The instructions after these patches yield two files, redo-jch.sh and redo-seen.sh. The first one has two sections separated by a "###" marker: the ones that are in 'next', and the ones that are in 'jch'. The third ones has topics that are only in 'seen' (which also contains all of the others). Why not have a single file with all of the topics, with two "###" markers? I.e., something like: # build the topic list from what's in 'seen' now Meta/Reintegrate master..seen >Meta/redo.sh # rebuild the first part of jch, which is everything in next git checkout -B master jch Meta/redo.sh -c1 # now build actual next, which should end up with the same tree git checkout next git merge master ;# if necessary Meta/redo.sh -c1 -e ;# -e to annotate any topics git diff jch next ;# should be identical # now build the rest of jch git checkout jch Meta/redo.sh -c2 # now build seen git checkout -B seen master Meta/redo.sh ;# no -c, do it all I _think_ the two are equivalent, and it seems more convenient to keep all of the topic names in one file (since they'd migrate across the cut to go from seen to jch, then jch to next). But maybe you (Junio) find it more convenient to keep them separate. The 'seen' list is a bit more fluid, and I'm sure you figured out how to copy lines between two different buffers in emacs. :) Mostly just curious. -Peff
