Re: [PATCH v3] index: add trace2 region for clear skip worktree

[Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 12:56:31AM +0000, Anh Le via GitGitGadget wrote:
> From: Anh Le <anh@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> In a large repository using sparse checkout, checking whether a file marked
> with skip worktree is present on disk and its skip worktree bit should be
> cleared can take a considerable amount of time. Add a trace2 region to
> surface this information, keeping a count of how many paths have been
> checked and separately keep counts for after a full index is materialised.

I think the text you wrote here is fine, but it did take me a couple of
passes to make sure I understood it correctly.

Perhaps the following might be clearer:

    When using sparse checkout, clear_skip_worktree_from_present_files()
    must enumerate index entries to find ones with the SKIP_WORKTREE bit
    to determine whether those index entries exist on disk (in which
    case their SKIP_WORKTREE bit should be removed).

    In a large repository, this may take considerable time depending on
    the size of the index.

    Add a trace2 region to surface this information, keeping a count o
    fhow many paths have been checked. Separately, keep counts after a
    full index is materialized.

Is that accurate?

> diff --git a/sparse-index.c b/sparse-index.c
> index e4a54ce1943..8301129bf8f 100644
> --- a/sparse-index.c
> +++ b/sparse-index.c
> @@ -493,24 +493,42 @@ void clear_skip_worktree_from_present_files(struct index_state *istate)
>  	int dir_found = 1;
>
>  	int i;
> +	int path_count[2] = {0, 0};
> +	int restarted = 0;

Looks good.

>  	if (!core_apply_sparse_checkout ||
>  	    sparse_expect_files_outside_of_patterns)
>  		return;
>
> +	trace2_region_enter("index", "clear_skip_worktree_from_present_files",
> +											istate->repo);

Here and below, there is some funky indentation. When I apply the patch
locally, I find that I need to squash this in:

--- >8 ---
diff --git a/sparse-index.c b/sparse-index.c
index 8301129bf8..23f997e103 100644
--- a/sparse-index.c
+++ b/sparse-index.c
@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ void clear_skip_worktree_from_present_files(struct index_state *istate)
 		return;

 	trace2_region_enter("index", "clear_skip_worktree_from_present_files",
-											istate->repo);
+			    istate->repo);
 restart:
 	for (i = 0; i < istate->cache_nr; i++) {
 		struct cache_entry *ce = istate->cache[i];
--- 8< ---

>  restart:
>  	for (i = 0; i < istate->cache_nr; i++) {
>  		struct cache_entry *ce = istate->cache[i];
>
> -		if (ce_skip_worktree(ce) &&
> -		    path_found(ce->name, &last_dirname, &dir_len, &dir_found)) {
> -			if (S_ISSPARSEDIR(ce->ce_mode)) {
> -				ensure_full_index(istate);
> -				goto restart;
> +		if (ce_skip_worktree(ce)) {
> +			path_count[restarted]++;
> +			if (path_found(ce->name, &last_dirname, &dir_len, &dir_found)) {
> +				if (S_ISSPARSEDIR(ce->ce_mode)) {
> +					if (restarted)
> +						BUG("ensure-full-index did not fully flatten?");
> +					ensure_full_index(istate);
> +					restarted = 1;
> +					goto restart;
> +				}
> +				ce->ce_flags &= ~CE_SKIP_WORKTREE;
>  			}
> -			ce->ce_flags &= ~CE_SKIP_WORKTREE;

Looks fine, though the "if (restarted) BUG(...)" is new. It's not wrong,
per-se, but seeing it in a separate commit either before or after the
main change would be appreciated.

>  		}
>  	}
> +
> +	if (path_count[0])
> +		trace2_data_intmax("index", istate->repo,
> +											 "sparse_path_count", path_count[0]);
> +	if (restarted)
> +		trace2_data_intmax("index", istate->repo,
> +											 "sparse_path_count_full", path_count[1]);
> +	trace2_region_leave("index", "clear_skip_worktree_from_present_files",
> +										  istate->repo);

Same note about indentation here.

Thanks,
Taylor