"brian m. carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 2022-10-28 at 21:16:09, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Julien Moutinho reports that in an environment where directory does >> not have BSD group semantics and requires g+s (aka FORCE_DIR_SET_GID) >> but the system cripples chmod() to forbid g+s, adjust_shared_perm() > > I would personally use a different verb here because I have the > impression it's offensive, at least when used as a noun. Perhaps > "limit" or "restrict" might be more neutral, or we could pick another > verb which expresses our displeasure at this design (maybe "impair"?) > but maybe is less likely to be emotionally charged or offend. castrates? butchers? tweaks? That's quite neutral.