Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I also think that part of the config API is a wart, but that we should > go for a different solution. It's the only config function that > doesn't return an "int" indicating whether we found the key. Overall I saw some things to like in the series, but was not impressed by others. The _multi() thing in the earliest patch is a welcome change, giving an option to call nonbool() is a good idea (but I have doubts about the exectuion), and "does the key exist?" may be a good thing to have. Others ranged between "Meh?" to "it might be good, but why does it have to be done here now?". Thanks.
