On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 07:22:13PM +0000, Alex Riesen wrote: > Pierre Habouzit, Sat, Oct 13, 2007 17:03:06 +0200: > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 02:47:20PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > Thinking about this more, I am reverting my stance on the ARRAY_SIZE() > > > issue. I think if you introduce a "OPTION_NONE = 0" in the enum, then > > > this single last comma should be enough. > > > > adding a trailing comma does not add a NULL after that, it's ignored, > > you're confused. > > Yep > > > Note that I don't really like using ARRAY_SIZE either, I kept it that > > way, but my taste would rather be to have an "empty" option, and > > explicitely mark the end of the array. > > You can have both. Just stop at NULL-entry or when the 'size' elements > passed, whatever happens first. Well I dislike the "count" thing, and Dscho agreed that it somehow sucked too. If you go see the current state of the ph/parseopt series you'll see it's not here anymore. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@xxxxxxxxxx OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpuwCRQT09Ca.pgp
Description: PGP signature
