Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > This version has been available for a while now without comment. Could > we consider it for merging to 'next' soon? Could somebody who has reviewed it fully give an Ack (or two)? I know an earlier rounds had some comments, but after v3 things have quieted down. I know the change from v4 to v5 has good improvements, but do not claim to have read the other parts in detail. Thanks.
