Re: [PATCH] fsmonitor: long status advice adapted to the fsmonitor use case

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 10/20/22 4:17 PM, Rudy Rigot wrote:
Oooh, I definitely like where your mind is with this. I think it makes a
lot of sense, there used to be one way to act upon a slow status, now there
are a few, so I can see how any in-depth explanation here would add to the
confusion for a user in a terminal who is just trying to get things done.
And I see how the current messaging already kinda infringes on that.

Alright, I can write the first draft of the documentation changes you were
mentioning. Heads up though: I'm going to need your tight review of it,
because I'm not as completely comfortable with what each option does as I
wish I was, so I worry I may write something accidentally inaccurate. I'll
take the time to read up on it though, and then I'll try my hand at it and
update it here, and let's take it from there if that sounds good.
> [...]

yeah, i'm happy to help.  just let me know when you have a first draft.

Jeff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux