On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 03:30:29PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > @@ -867,8 +860,6 @@ int cmd_repack(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) > > split_pack_geometry(geometry, geometric_factor); > > } > > > > - sigchain_push_common(remove_pack_on_signal); > > - > > prepare_pack_objects(&cmd, &po_args); > > > > show_progress = !po_args.quiet && isatty(2); > > @@ -1020,14 +1011,14 @@ int cmd_repack(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) > > fname_old = mkpathdup("%s-%s%s", > > packtmp, item->string, exts[ext].name); > > > > - if (data->exts[ext]) { > > + if (data->tempfiles[ext]) { > > struct stat statbuffer; > > if (!stat(fname_old, &statbuffer)) { > > statbuffer.st_mode &= ~(S_IWUSR | S_IWGRP | S_IWOTH); > > chmod(fname_old, statbuffer.st_mode); > > } > > > > - if (rename(fname_old, fname)) > > + if (rename_tempfile(&data->tempfiles[ext], fname)) > > die_errno(_("renaming '%s' failed"), fname_old); > > It now got a bit confusing that we have 'fname', 'fname_old', and > the tempfile. The path.buf used as the argument to register_tempfile() > matches what is used to compute fname_old above. I wonder if tempfile > API does not give us that name so that we can stop using fname_old here? It does, and we probably should use get_tempfile_path() in the error message here. But sadly we can't get rid of fname_old entirely, as it's used below this for the second block in the if-else chain: if (data->tempfiles[ext]) { ...do the rename ... } else if (!exts[ext].optional) die(_("missing required file: %s"), fname_old); else if (unlink(fname) < 0 && errno != ENOENT) die_errno(_("could not unlink: %s"), fname); OTOH, it would probably be equally readable (or perhaps even better) for that second block to say: die("pack-objects did not generate a '%s' file for pack %s", exts[ext].name, item->string); And then we could drop fname_old entirely. Which is nice, because it gets rid of the implicit assumption that the tempfile matches what is in fname_old (which is always true, but since they are generated by individual lines far apart from each other, it's possible for that to change). -Peff