On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 02:54:56AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > So the patch looks good to me as-is (and sorry for the verbose review; > we've just had enough tricky corner cases in this repack code that I > wanted to make sure I understood all the implications). Yeah, I agree that this is probably premature optimization, but in practice it doesn't hurt much. Copying it was definitely intentional, and I share your general unease about changing it in this patch. Thanks, Taylor
