Glen Choo <chooglen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I wished we had caught it sooner too. The folks here generally agree > that our weekly release cycle is not ideal for reasons such as this. > Hopefully this is good motivation to move that work forward, though I > can't promise anything right now. It is perfectly OK to have an automated trial build job that runs more frequently than your weekly release cycle, though. It should usually yield only a single bit of usable information (e.g. "there is no 'does not even build from the source' issue in upstream") that may give you assurance (e.g. "if we maintain the course, the next real build for release would hopefully go smoothly"), but when it breaks, you have more time to react. Thanks.
