Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I don't think its written to if we take the 'else if' branch added by > this patch so we need to initialize it for the free() at the end. Actually, I didn't get it totally (maybe because my English, sorry for that), but indeed the 'else if' expose this problem out, so I think to initialize it is needed. Thanks. > We only seem to be using cp.buf.len so we can test check if the original > note was empty so I think it would be better just to add > > int note_was_empty; > > ` ... > > note_was_empty = !d.buf.len > > instead. Yes, it actually does as you describe above, your suggestion makes it look better, will apply. Thank you very much for your detailed review.
