Re: [PATCH 0/2] [2.38 regression] config: respect includes in protected config

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Cc-ing folks again. Looks like I made a mistake initially, sorry for the
noise.

"Glen Choo via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Here's a fix for the regression reported in [1]. I'm quite confident that
> the test suite is extensive enough to catch any unintended behavioral
> changes, but I'd appreciate a second opinion.
>
> Cc: Derrick Stolee derrickstolee@xxxxxxxxxx, Taylor Blau me@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
> Johannes Schindelin Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx, Junio C Hamano
> gitster@xxxxxxxxx
>
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAPWNY8W_Tr-WoD-GXBddD5Y8w5Y4w+gDNYQdOAJ1uBwVHuRrsQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Glen Choo (2):
>   t0033, t0035: test for included config
>   config: respect includes in protected config
>
>  config.c                        | 30 ++++++++----------------------
>  t/t0033-safe-directory.sh       |  9 +++++++++
>  t/t0035-safe-bare-repository.sh |  9 +++++++++
>  3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 3dcec76d9df911ed8321007b1d197c1a206dc164
> Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-1360%2Fchooglen%2Fprotected-config%2Frespect-includes-v1
> Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-1360/chooglen/protected-config/respect-includes-v1
> Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/1360
> -- 
> gitgitgadget



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux