Re: [PATCH v3] branch: description for non-existent branch errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/10/22 5:27, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 8:49 PM Rubén Justo <rjusto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> [...]
>> Make the error descriptions for those branch operations with unborn or
>> non-existent branches, more informative.
>> [...]
>> Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/t/t3202-show-branch.sh b/t/t3202-show-branch.sh
>> @@ -7,6 +7,28 @@ test_description='test show-branch'
>> +test_expect_success 'error descriptions on empty repository' '
>> +       current=$(git branch --show-current) &&
>> +       cat >expect <<-EOF &&
>> +       error: No commit on branch '\''$current'\'' yet.
>> +       EOF
> 
> It's a matter of taste, but leaving and re-entering the single-quoted
> context, along with escaping, can make for a difficult read. You could
> instead take advantage of the SQ variable already defined by the test
> scripts:
> 
>     echo "error: No commit on branch $SQ$current$SQ yet." >expect &&
> 
> Not worth a re-roll, of course.
> 
>> +test_expect_success 'fatal descriptions on empty repository' '
>> +       current=$(git branch --show-current) &&
>> +       cat >expect <<-EOF &&
>> +       fatal: No commit on branch '\''$current'\'' yet.
>> +       EOF
> 
> Ditto.

Thanks, I didn't know about $SQ.

	'\''$current'\'' vs $SQ$current$SQ vs ${SQ}$current${SQ}

I also find ugly that escaping, but I think is harder to read and
error prone to use $SQ here.. :-/




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux