Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> No changes to t/ directory? > > Hmm...any test you would like to see in particular? Here, we just fail > with a specific error message when any sort of fetching from the > promisor remote due to a lookup of a missing object. I presume that we already have a test that interact with a promisor remote that does not keep its promise? If we don't then adding one or two would help. If we do, then how the command fails would probably be different (observable via trace2) with your "early break" change, no?
