Hey Chris, hey René,
thanks a lot for your replys.
> So, Tim, does `git stash show -p stash@{0}` work for you?
Yes, that works indeed. However, in my certain use-case I would prefer using `git diff`.
> Letting `git diff X^!` mean the same as `git diff X ^X^` for a non-merge
> makes sense to me given the definition from gitrevisions(7) cited above.
> That in turn is the same as `git diff X^..X` and `git diff X^ X`.
Yes, that is exactly how it worked before. And all the other syntaxes still work correctly.
René, I saw you submitted some patches already, but these weren't approved obviously. So how does this continue now?
Kind regards,
Tim
--
Tim Jaacks
SOFTWARE DEVELOPER
SECO Northern Europe GmbH
Schlachthofstrasse 20
21079 Hamburg
Germany
T: +49 40 791899-183
E: tim.jaacks@xxxxxxxx
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 148893
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Heczko, Marc-Michael Braun, Massimo Mauri
