On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Brandon Casey wrote:
<snip>
This is a nice cleanup, but it does not belong in this patch.
I was thinking the same thing right after I sent it off.
@@ -211,6 +205,16 @@ int cmd_gc(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
prune = 0;
if (!need_to_gc())
return 0;
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * Use safer (for shared repos) "-A" option to
+ * repack when not pruning. Auto-gc makes its
+ * own decision.
+ */
+ if (prune)
+ append_option(argv_repack, "-a", MAX_ADD);
+ else
+ append_option(argv_repack, "-A", MAX_ADD);
}
if (pack_refs && run_command_v_opt(argv_pack_refs, RUN_GIT_CMD))
To use the append_option() function, you need to make sure that the argv
has enough space, so I suggest adding another NULL to argv_repack[]. This
is enough, since you only ever add one option. But you should mention it
somewhere, probably above the definition of argv_repack[].
Shouldn't argv_repack have space for MAX_ADD (10) items?
append_option() is already used with argv_repack when --aggressive is
used.
Other than that: I think your patch makes tons of sense; much better than
what I tried to cobble together with the cyclic alternates detection.
Thanks.
-brandon
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html