Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > FWIW this wasn't a "while at it", it was critical to making another part > of that topic work at all. Perhaps it was critical within the approach of the topic took, and if a different approach was taken or the scope of topic was reduced, you would have avoided it. I would still consider such an unnecessary change an unwated "whilte at it". The moral of the story is that the topic took too big a bite to be done without causing unnecessary mistakes like this.
