Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I was confused as to why this was safe as it means we're still reading > the individual fields from unaligned addresses. The reason it is safe > is that we use get_bexx() to read the fields and those functions > handle unaligned access. I wonder if it is worth adding a note to > clarify that if you re-roll. I've got so used to ours that gives unaligned accesses, but I guess in some other circles, get_XeYY() means reading YY bit-wide integer in X byte-order from a preperly aligned address, and if that is the case, I do not mind such a comment somewhere. It would help those coming from such a background very much. Thanks.
