Skrab Sah <skrab.sah@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Let me elaborate to you, how and why I wanted to implement the No, I won't let you ;-), and that was the most important part you seem to have missed in the message you are responding to: we do not work with the handwaving. > 2. no need to declare anything in the header file, which is > time consuming and a headache for developers. This alone is enough to convince me that this should not be done. Unless the tool can infer the intent while generating the headers and place comments describing why it exists and what it and its parameters mean next to the function definition it produces, that is, in which case I may be OK. As developers become more and more experienced, they will invest more and more time in getting the interface right. We shouldn't target developers who find the time to do so a waste and headache. Thanks.
