On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 5:42 AM ZheNing Hu <adlternative@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hey, guys, > > If two users of git monorepo are working on different sub project > /project1 and /project2 by partial-clone and sparse-checkout , > if user one push first, then user two want to push too, he must > pull some blob which pushed by user one. I guess their repo size > will gradually increase by other's project's objects, so is there any way > to delete unnecessary blobs out of working project (sparse-checkout > filterspec), or just git pull don't really fetch these unnecessary blobs? This is exactly what the combination of partial clone and sparse checkout is for! Dev A is working on project1/, and excludes project2/ from her sparse filter; she also cloned with `--filter=blob:none`. Dev B is working on project2/, and excludes project1/ from his sparse filter, and similarly is using blob:none partial clone filter. Assuming everybody is contributing by direct push, and not using a code review tool or something else which handles the push for them... Dev A finishes first, and pushes. Dev B needs to pull, like you say - but during that pull he doesn't need to fetch the objects in project1, because they're excluded by the combination of his partial clone filter and his sparse checkout pattern. The pull needs to happen because there is a new commit which Dev B's commit needs to treat as a parent, and so Dev B's client needs to know the ID of that commit. > > The large number of interruptions in git push may be another > problem, if thousands of probjects are in one monorepo, and > no one else has any code that would conflict with me in any way, > but I need pull everytime? Is there a way to make improvements > here? The typical improvement people make here is to use some form of automation or tooling to perform the push and merge for them. That usually falls to the code review tool. We can call the history like this: "S" is the source commit which both A and B branched from, and "A" and "B" are the commits by their respective owners. Because of the order of push, we want the final commit history to look like "S -> A -> B". Dev A's local history looks like "S -> A" and Dev B's local history looks like "S -> B". If we're using the GitHub PR model, then GitHub may do merge commits for us, and it creates those merge commits automatically at the time someone pushes "Merge PR" (or whatever the button is called). So our history probably looks like: o (merge B) | \ o | (merge A) |\ | | | B | A | | / / S In this case, neither A or B need to know about each other, because the merge commit is being created by the code review tool. With tooling like Gerrit, or other tooling that uses the rebase strategy (rather than merge), pretty much the same thing happens - both devs can push without knowing about their own commit because the review tool's automation performs the rebase (that is, the "git pull" you described) for them. But if you're not using tooling, yeah, Dev B needs to know which commit should come before his own commit, so he needs to fetch latest history, even though the only changes are from Dev A who was working somewhere else in the monorepo. > > Here's an example of how two users constrain each other when git push. > > #!/bin/sh > > rm -rf mono-repo > git init mono-repo -b main > ( > cd mono-repo > mkdir project1 > mkdir project2 > for ((i=0;i<10;i++)) > do > echo $i >> project1/file1 > echo $i >> project2/file2 > done > git add . > git commit -m init > ) > > rm -rf mono-repo.git > git clone --bare mono-repo > > # user1 > rm -rf m1 > git clone --filter="blob:none" --no-checkout --no-local ./mono-repo.git m1 > ( > cd m1 > git sparse-checkout set project1 > git checkout main > for ((i=0;i<10;i++)) > do > echo "data1-$i" >> project1/file1 > git add . > git commit -m "c1 $i" > done > ) > > # user2 > rm -rf m2 > git clone --filter="blob:none" --no-checkout --no-local ./mono-repo.git m2 > ( > cd m2 > git sparse-checkout set project2 > git checkout main > for ((i=0;i<10;i++)) > do > echo "data2-$i" >> project2/file2 > git add . > git commit -m "c2 $i" > done > ) > > # user1 push > ( > cd m1 > git push > ) > > # user2 push failed, then pull user1's blob > ( > cd m2 > git cat-file --batch-check --batch-all-objects | grep blob | wc -l > > blob_count1 > git push > git -c pull.rebase=false pull --no-edit #no conflict > git cat-file --batch-check --batch-all-objects | grep blob | wc -l > > blob_count2 > diff blob_count1 blob_count2 > ) > > -- > ZheNing Hu
