Hi Derrick, On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 11:48 PM Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I look forward to your next version. I hope to see some information about > the performance characteristics across the two versions. Specifically: > > 1. How do various test in t/perf/ change between the two formats? > 2. For certain test repos (git/git, torvalds/linux, etc.) how much does > the .bitmap file change in size across the formats? Yeah, sure. I will be including the performance test result in the next version :) > > Makefile | 3 + > > bitmap.c | 225 + > > bitmap.h | 33 + > ... > > ewah/bitmap.c | 61 +- > > ewah/ewok.h | 37 +- > ... > > roaring/roaring.c | 20047 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > roaring/roaring.h | 1028 ++ > > I wonder if there is value in modifying the structure of these files > into a bitmap/ directory and then perhaps ewah/ and roaring/ within > each? Just a thought. Great idea! Thanks! Will change it in the next version.. Thanks :)
