Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Sergey Organov <sorganov@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Get rid of special-casing of 'suppress' in set_diff_merges(). Instead
>> set 'merges_need_diff' flag correctly in every option handling
>> function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sergey Organov <sorganov@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> diff-merges.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> Looks OK to me.
>
> Everybody else says set_X() but set_none() has nothing to do ther
> than calling suppress(), so the change does not really make a
> functional difference (as you said in the cover letter).
>
> Is the idea that the original value in .merges_need_diff member does
> not matter because in every case it is set to either 0 or 1? Most
> cases call common_setup() to set it to 1 like this here...
Yes, exactly.
>
>> +static void common_setup(struct rev_info *revs)
>> +{
>> + suppress(revs);
>> + revs->merges_need_diff = 1;
>> +}
>
> ... but this does not touch (in other words, it does not explicitly
> clear) it, ...
>
>> +static void set_none(struct rev_info *revs)
>> +{
>> + suppress(revs);
>> +}
>
> ... so we still rely on somebody to set the .merges_need_diff
> to 0 initially, right?
No, the suppress() does clear everything, .merges_need_diff included.
The suppress() ensures every next diff-merges option on the command-line
actually overwrites and correctly sets everything.
>
>> -
>> - /* NOTE: the merges_need_diff flag is cleared by func() call */
>> - if (func != suppress)
>> - revs->merges_need_diff = 1;
>> }
>
> It is very good to see this one go.
Yep, that was a kludge that bothered me for a while indeed.
>
>> /*
>> @@ -115,6 +122,7 @@ int diff_merges_parse_opts(struct rev_info *revs, const char **argv)
>>
>> if (!suppress_m_parsing && !strcmp(arg, "-m")) {
>> set_to_default(revs);
>> + revs->merges_need_diff = 0;
>
> I am wondering how this becomes necessary? Is it because
> set_to_default() would flip the member to 1 unconditionally, or
> something?
Yes, as all "native" -diff-merge= options set this bit to 1.
> If it weren't for this hunk, the lossage of the previous
> hunk is a very good clean-up, but if we need to do this, I cannot
> shake the feeling that we mostly shifted the dirt around, without
> really cleaning it? I dunno.
Yes, I believe it does cleanup things in both these places.
The "-m" option indeed differs from the rest of the options in exactly
this thing: it wants .merges_need_diff=0 to suppress output unless '-p'
is given as well.
The -c/--cc are in fact similar, but they don't need this line as they
imply '-p' that in turn ignores .merges_need_diff, and generates output
anyway, so -m code has:
revs->merges_need_diff = 0;
whereas -c and --cc code both have:
revs->merges_imply_patch = 1;
Thanks,
-- Sergey Organov
>
>> @@ -125,7 +133,7 @@ int diff_merges_parse_opts(struct rev_info *revs, const char **argv)
>> set_remerge_diff(revs);
>> revs->merges_imply_patch = 1;
>> } else if (!strcmp(arg, "--no-diff-merges")) {
>> - suppress(revs);
>> + set_none(revs);
>
> We do not need to explicitly set .merges_need_diff to 0 here,
> presumably because it is initialized to 0 and nobody touched it,
> right?
No, we rather do set it to 0 here, in suppress() called from set_none().
Thanks,
-- Sergey Organov
