Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Victoria Dye via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> From: Victoria Dye <vdye@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Add a reviewing guidelines document including advice and common terminology >> used in Git mailing list reviews. The document is included in the >> 'TECH_DOCS' list in order to include it in Git's published documentation. >> >> Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> >> Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- > > I've commented on the text but haven't seen anybody else reviewing. > No interest? Everybody silently happy? My guess is that there aren't as many eyes on this as there might typically be because of Git Merge. In any case, I plan to re-roll based on your feedback [1] (ideally) by the end of the week if other reviews aren't sent in the meantime. I'm hoping there's a bit more interest after Git Merge. With reviewing being such an integral part of contribution to Git, I'm really interested in hearing people's thoughts on what should/shouldn't be in this document. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqwnacibbm.fsf@gitster.g/
