Re: [PATCH v6 00/16] Finish converting git bisect into a built-in

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx>
writes:

> Changes since v5:
>
>  * Fixed the commit message of "bisect run: fix the error message" that had
>    become stale as of v3 due to 80c2e9657f2 "overtaking" it and doing half
>    of its job.
>  * Skipped translation usage strings in "bisect--helper: migrate to
>    OPT_SUBCOMMAND()" that do not contain translatable parts.
>  * Minor white-space clean-up in "bisect--helper: migrate to
>    OPT_SUBCOMMAND()".

Other than "deliberately breaking the first steps that tried a nice
libification that passed 'terms' pair through the codepath could not
be a good idea" thing, we did not see any comments on this round.

Do people not care about this topic, are people all silently happy,
or what?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux