Re: [PATCH 0/3] fix failing t4301 test and &&-chain breakage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 10:53 PM Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 1:05 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >   t4301: account for behavior differences between sed implementations
> > >   t4031: fix broken &&-chains and add missing loop termination
> > >   t4301: emit blank line in more idiomatic fashion
> >
> > The second one is off by 270.
>
> Apparently Eric knew what you meant, but I'm perplexed by this
> statement and what it means.  What am I missing?

Junio's comment was opaque to me, as well, and it took several minutes
to figure it out (especially since I authored the patches, thus I read
what I expected to read, not what was really there). Taking a look at
just prefixes on the patch subject lines...

    t4301
    t4031
    t4301

there's a transposition in there which, mathematically speaking, makes
one of the test script numbers 270 less than the others.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux