Thanks for getting back to me. I'll write up a patch. brian m. carlson writes: > On 2022-08-26 at 21:00:25, Strawbridge, Michael wrote: > > Hi, > > Hey, > > > I was hoping to put a feature proposal forward for git > > send-email. > > > > For git send-email there is a git hook, sendemail-validate > > which > > gets the body of the email that will be sent but is missing > > some > > of the metadata that git send-email has access to. I propose > > that > > we also pass the extra metadata that gets presented to the > > user > > later on via stdout such as: From, To, Cc, Subject, Date, > > Message-Id, X-Mailer, MIME-Version, Content-Transfer-Encoding > > to > > the git hook. > > > > I'm willing to work on the patch but want to make sure the > > idea > > would be accepted first. > > I think the idea is interesting and would be willing to see a > patch come > to the list. > > However, having said that, we typically evaluate patches, not > proposals, > so to see if it's actually accepted, you'd have to actually send > a > patch. We may find that while the idea is interesting, it turns > out to > be infeasible, or, for whatever reason, the patch is unsuitable. > > I know that this is different from how other projects typically > work, > where you typically pitch an idea first and then implement, but > it's > what we do here. > -- > brian m. carlson (he/him or they/them) > Toronto, Ontario, CA
