Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] revision: allow --ancestry-path to take an argument

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>  			ancestry_path:1,
> +
> +			/* True if --ancestry-path was specified without an
> +			 * argument. The bottom revisions are implicitly
> +			 * the arguments in this case.
> +			 */
> +			ancestry_path_implicit_bottoms:1,

The above comment explains why this is called "implicit" very well.
The earlier round used "need", but the word missed the essense (i.e.
ancestry_path argument is implicit and not given, so we need to
compute bottoms and use them instead).  The new name is certainly
better.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux