Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] scalar-unregister: handle error codes greater than 0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Victoria Dye via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> From: Victoria Dye <vdye@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> When 'scalar unregister' tries to disable maintenance and remove an
> enlistment, ensure that the return value is nonzero if either operation
> produces *any* nonzero return value, not just when they return a value less
> than 0.

Interesting.  Did this actually cause problems in the wild?  Just
being curious.

The return values from toggle_maintenance() and add_or_remove() are
what scalar.c::run_git() returns, which in turn come from
run_command() and eventually come from wait_or_whine(), so it very
well can be a positive non-zero value that signals a failure.  It is
good to be prepared to see not just negative values but also
positive ones.

> Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  contrib/scalar/scalar.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/contrib/scalar/scalar.c b/contrib/scalar/scalar.c
> index 97e71fe19cd..e888fa5408e 100644
> --- a/contrib/scalar/scalar.c
> +++ b/contrib/scalar/scalar.c
> @@ -253,10 +253,10 @@ static int unregister_dir(void)
>  {
>  	int res = 0;
>  
> -	if (toggle_maintenance(0) < 0)
> +	if (toggle_maintenance(0))
>  		res = -1;
>  
> -	if (add_or_remove_enlistment(0) < 0)
> +	if (add_or_remove_enlistment(0))
>  		res = -1;
>  
>  	return res;



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux