Re: [PATCH] tests: fix incorrect --write-junit-xml code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio,

On Wed, 10 Aug 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
>
> > The funny thing is that you're usually simply not picking up patches that
> > do not get any reviews, but for these refactorings it is somehow
> > different, and I do not understand why it needs to be different.
>
> Well, I am not sure if encouraging the maintainer to drop patches
> that are not reviewed is a good overall direction you would want to
> go in.

I am not encouraging you to drop high-quality patches that have a clear
benefit to the project and/or Git's users. You probably know me better
than to assume that I would ever do such a thing. You probably meant this
comment tongue-in-cheek, but I cannot really tell.

It's about these long patch series that touch everything and their dog and
the end result brings no clear benefit to users nor the Git project
itself. I can easily imagine how wonderful it would be not to see such
patch series ever again. ;-)

> But let's try that.  Less work for me, less disruption to our tree,
> and the world may be quieter and more pleasant ;-)

Amen!

Ciao,
Dscho




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux